
Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters
“As a reporter,” Fox News anchor Chris Wallace said of Ambassador Gordon Sondland’s bombshell testimony before the House impeachment inquiry on Wednesday afternoon, “it seems to me, we have to go to what the headline is today.” And that headline, Wallace explained, was that Sondland had directly implicated President Donald Trump in a quid pro quo in which an Oval Office meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and potentially U.S. military aid to Ukraine were conditioned on Zelensky’s public announcement of investigations intended to benefit Trump politically.
After Fox News contributors Andy McCarthy and Ken Starr try to put a positive GOP spin on Sondland's testimony, Chris Wallace blows it all up:
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) November 20, 2019
They "are very good lawyers and "can parse this" any way they want but we already got our headline from this – there was a quid pro quo. pic.twitter.com/ys3iTuJsHf
On the websites of many national news outlets, journalists had indeed determined that the headline coming out of the hearing was Sondland’s acknowledgement of the quid pro quo and his declaration that senior officials, including Trump, were engaged in its formulation.
But that sentiment was not universal. Shortly after Wallace’s remark, I checked FoxNews.com, the website associated with his own network. There, the top headline was “President Trump declares ‘it’s all over’ for impeachment inquiry after Sondland testimony.”
Other headlines on the site hyped Sondland’s statement that Trump had told him he wanted “no quid pro quo” from Zelensky — Sondland made clear that whatever Trump said, it was obvious the Ukrainians weren’t going to get the meeting or aid if they didn’t announce the investigations — or promoted diatribes from House Republicans and the network’s own commentators denouncing the inquiry.

As the afternoon went on, FoxNews.com moved even further away from the story Wallace had considered the hearing’s “headline.”
Updates from Fox News' alternate reality. pic.twitter.com/YrCOLjjuxf
— Matthew Gertz (@MattGertz) November 20, 2019
That’s typical for FoxNews.com, whose homepage is a window into pure, unfiltered GOP propaganda, downplaying or ignoring stories damaging to the president while vigorously promoting his interests.
Top stories as of 9:30 a.m.https://t.co/sMcjyo9G1o: "Mulvaney Sends Trump Defense on Ukraine Aid Into Disarray"https://t.co/hw6IYF0RwI: "The guardrails are off the Trump presidency"https://t.co/coMvrIzJ3S: "Trump, at packed Dallas rally, lays into surprising 2020 candidate" pic.twitter.com/LaPqD9oOpi
— Matthew Gertz (@MattGertz) October 18, 2019
Current top stories:https://t.co/qDXc8zflch: Cohen raidhttps://t.co/hw6IYF0RwI: Cohen raidhttps://t.co/rFZRELEjdl: Cohen raidhttps://t.co/coMvrIzJ3S: "Zuckerberg wavers as pro-Trump social media stars Diamond and Silk slam Facebook’s ‘unsafe’ tag" pic.twitter.com/pI6qEEO6QZ
— Matthew Gertz (@MattGertz) April 9, 2018
Top stories on news websites.
— Matthew Gertz (@MattGertz) February 27, 2018
ABC: Jared Kushner
WaPo: Jared Kushner
NYT: Jared Kushnerhttps://t.co/coMvrIzJ3S: "Judge accused of bias by Trump rules against challenge to border wall" pic.twitter.com/54YFv81jYx
Top website stories as of 7:35 am
— Matthew Gertz (@MattGertz) December 8, 2018
CNN: Cohen and Manafort
NBC: Cohen and Manafort
ABC: Manafort
Fox News: "PARIS ON LOCKDOWN" pic.twitter.com/9WVzN8ARqo
The tendency has been particularly clear since last summer. That’s when Fox — for all its airs about having separate news and opinion divisions — put Sean Hannity’s then-executive producer, Porter Berry, in charge of its website.
Reporters would consider Sondland’s bombshells about Trump and the quid pro quo “the headline” coming out of the hearing, as Wallace points out. But reporters aren’t in charge at FoxNews.com.